Model-Driven vs Canvas Apps ๐ฑ
Last reviewed: September 15, 2026
Both are Power Apps, but they start from opposite ends. A canvas app gives you a blank screen and total design control; a model-driven app builds the UI for you from your Dataverse data model. Pick based on data, control and speed.
TL;DR: Canvas apps mean pixel-perfect design, any data source via connectors, and you control everything with Power Fx. Model-driven apps mean Dataverse only, a component-driven no-code UI thatโs automatically responsive and accessible, consistent and fast to build once your data model exists. Design-heavy, multi-source scenarios point to canvas. Data-model-heavy, process-driven scenarios point to model-driven.
Side by side
| Category | Model-driven | Canvas |
|---|---|---|
| Data platform | Dataverse only | Dataverse + many others |
| Design experience | No-code, component-based | Power Fx expressions |
| UI control | Limited | Full control |
| Consistency | High | Designer decides |
| Migration | Simple | Can be complex |
| Speed of creation | Rapid | Depends on design |
| Responsive | Automatic | Only if designed in |
| Relationship navigation | Automatic | Only via Power Fx |
| Accessibility | Built in | Must be designed in |
When to build a model-driven app
๐ธ Your data lives in Dataverse and has real relationships (1:N, N:N) you want to navigate automatically.
๐ธ You want rapid, consistent apps where the layout is largely determined by components, forms and views, not custom pixels.
๐ธ You value built-in responsiveness and accessibility and a uniform UX across many apps, since users who learn one app already know the others.
๐ธ Youโre building process-centric business apps (case management, records, dashboards) and moving them cleanly between dev/test/prod with solutions.
When to build a canvas app
๐ธ You need total control over layout and a tailored, branded experience.
๐ธ Your data isnโt only Dataverse: SharePoint, SQL, Excel, or many services through connectors.
๐ธ You want task- or role-specific screens, custom interactions, and Power Fx-driven behavior.
๐ธ The trade-off: you own responsiveness and accessibility yourself, and cross-environment migration can be more complex when data sources differ.
Donโt forget: code apps
๐ธ Thereโs a third, developer-focused type, code apps (pro-code, currently preview), for teams who want full code control with the Power Platform behind them. See the app-types overview for how all three compare and their licensing.
Licensing
๐ธ Model-driven apps require Dataverse, so they need a premium Power Apps license (per user or per app).
๐ธ Canvas apps can run on standard connectors under seeded Microsoft 365 licensing until you use a premium/custom connector or Dataverse, which then requires a premium Power Apps license.
๐ธ See the app-types page for exact figures on Power Apps Premium and per-app plans.
๐ ๏ธ FAQ
Can a model-driven app use SharePoint as its data source? No, model-driven apps are Dataverse only. Use a canvas app (or connect SharePoint into Dataverse) if your data lives in SharePoint.
Which is more responsive out of the box? Model-driven apps are automatically responsive and accessible; canvas apps are only responsive if you design them that way.
Which is faster to build? Once your Dataverse data model exists, model-driven is rapid. Canvas speed depends on how complex your custom design is.
Can I mix them? Yes, you can embed a canvas app inside a model-driven form to get custom UI where you need it while keeping the model-driven structure.
๐ Related
๐ธ Power Apps app types, canvas, model-driven and code apps plus licensing.
๐ธ Dataverse vs SharePoint, the data question behind the choice.
๐ธ Power Fx Variables Deep Dive, for canvas app logic.
๐ธ All Power Apps tips ยท Knowledge base overview
Details reflect Microsoft Learn at time of writing. Always confirm current behavior and licensing in the Microsoft Power Apps documentation.